CO-143 Denial Code: Complete Resolution Guide for Deferred Payment Portions

|
Facebook
Co 143 denial code

Table of Contents

Immediate Solution: Track and Follow Up on Pending Payments

CO-143 denial means the insurance company is holding back a portion of your payment pending additional review, coordination with other payers, or receipt of missing information. This is not a true denial but a payment deferral requiring active tracking. To resolve immediately, contact the payer’s provider services to identify what specific information or process is causing the deferral, provide any missing documentation, and establish a follow-up timeline. Most CO-143 situations resolve within 30-60 days with proper follow-up.

Understanding CO-143: Root Causes and Triggers

The CO-143 adjustment reason code indicates that part of the claim payment is being held in suspense while the payer conducts additional review or awaits resolution of specific issues. Unlike standard denials, CO-143 represents a temporary hold rather than a permanent rejection, making it critical to understand the underlying cause and appropriate response strategy.

Primary Triggers for Payment Deferrals:

Coordination of Benefits (COB) Issues:

  • Waiting for primary payer information or EOB
  • Investigating potential third-party liability (auto accidents, workers’ comp)
  • Resolving Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) situations
  • Coordinating with patient’s multiple insurance policies

Medical Review Requirements:

  • Claims flagged for medical necessity review
  • High-dollar claims requiring additional authorization
  • Services requiring peer-to-peer physician consultation
  • Experimental or investigational procedure reviews

Administrative Processing Delays:

  • Missing or incomplete prior authorization documentation
  • Pending provider credentialing or contract updates
  • System processing delays for complex claims
  • Multi-state coordination for out-of-network services

Claims Investigation Scenarios:

  • Duplicate claim investigation (multiple submissions)
  • Fraud and abuse screening reviews
  • Unusual billing pattern analysis
  • High-frequency service utilization reviews

Critical Information to Verify and Track

Essential Claim Details for CO-143 Follow-up

Information CategoryWhat to DocumentWhere to Find
Deferral ReasonSpecific cause of payment holdEOB remarks, payer correspondence
Deferred AmountExact dollar amount being heldEOB payment summary
Expected ResolutionEstimated timeframe for decisionPayer customer service
Required ActionsWhat provider must submitEOB instructions, payer portal
Reference NumbersTracking numbers for deferred portionEOB, claim confirmation

CMS1500/UB04 Fields Frequently Involved in CO-143

FormFieldCommon Deferral Issues
CMS1500 Box 11Other Insurance InfoMissing COB information
CMS1500 Box 23Prior AuthorizationPending auth verification
CMS1500 Box 24EDiagnosis PointersMedical necessity review
UB04 FL 18-28Condition CodesLiability investigation
UB04 FL 31-34Occurrence CodesAccident-related deferrals
UB04 FL 50-55Payer InformationCOB verification delays

Documentation Requirements by Deferral Type

Deferral ReasonRequired DocumentationSubmission MethodTimeline
COB InvestigationPrimary payer EOB, insurance cardsFax, portal upload30 days
Medical ReviewMedical records, physician notesSecure email, portal45 days
Prior Auth PendingAuthorization request, clinical notesElectronic submission14 days
Liability InvestigationAccident reports, legal documentationCertified mail60 days

Prevention Strategies: Minimizing CO-143 Deferrals

Step 1: Comprehensive Pre-Service Verification

  1. Verify all insurance coverage including primary, secondary, and tertiary
  2. Check for third-party liability (auto, workers’ comp, general liability)
  3. Confirm prior authorization status for all services requiring approval
  4. Document coordination of benefits hierarchy and effective dates

Step 2: Complete Claim Submission Protocol

Front-End Verification Checklist:

  • Primary insurance verification within 48 hours of service
  • Secondary insurance coordination rules confirmed
  • Prior authorization obtained and documented
  • Third-party liability screening completed
  • Medical necessity documentation prepared
  • Provider credentialing status current

Claim Preparation Standards:

  • All required fields completed accurately
  • Supporting documentation attached proactively
  • Coordination of benefits information included
  • Prior authorization numbers referenced
  • Medical necessity justification provided when applicable

Step 3: Proactive Communication Protocols

Pre-submission Communication:

  • Contact payer for complex cases before submission
  • Verify specific documentation requirements
  • Confirm processing timelines for unusual services
  • Establish direct contact for high-dollar claims

Post-submission Monitoring:

  • Track claims through payer portals daily
  • Follow up on pending claims within 14 days
  • Document all communication with payers
  • Escalate delays beyond normal processing times

Resolution Process: Converting Deferrals to Payments

Step 1: Immediate Assessment (Day 1-2)

  1. Review EOB thoroughly to identify specific deferral reason
  2. Check payer portal for additional information or requests
  3. Verify claim completeness against original submission
  4. Document deferral details in practice management system

Step 2: Information Gathering (Day 3-5)

  1. Contact payer customer service for specific requirements
  2. Gather requested documentation from appropriate sources
  3. Verify completeness of information package
  4. Prepare submission in payer’s preferred format

Step 3: Response Submission (Day 6-10)

For COB-Related Deferrals:

  • Submit primary payer EOB or denial letter
  • Include insurance verification documentation
  • Provide coordination of benefits worksheet if available
  • Submit via payer’s preferred method (portal, fax, mail)

For Medical Review Deferrals:

  • Compile complete medical records for services
  • Include physician’s notes supporting medical necessity
  • Attach any relevant diagnostic test results
  • Prepare peer-to-peer consultation if requested

For Administrative Deferrals:

  • Submit missing prior authorization documentation
  • Provide updated provider credentialing information
  • Include any requested administrative forms
  • Confirm receipt through payer confirmation system

Step 4: Follow-up and Tracking (Day 11-30)

  1. Confirm receipt of submitted documentation
  2. Establish follow-up timeline with payer representative
  3. Document all interactions in patient account
  4. Monitor payer portal for status updates
  5. Escalate to supervisor if delays exceed expected timeframes

Appeal Process: When Deferrals Become Denials

Understanding Deferral-to-Denial Conversion

Automatic Conversion Triggers:

  • No response to information requests within specified timeframe
  • Incomplete documentation submission
  • Failure to provide requested clinical information
  • Missing coordination of benefits information beyond deadline

Timeline Considerations:

  • Most payers convert deferrals to denials after 30-90 days
  • Medicare has specific timelines for medical review deferrals
  • Commercial payers vary in deferral-to-denial conversion policies
  • Workers’ compensation may extend deferral periods indefinitely

Deferral-Specific Appeal Strategy

Pre-Conversion Appeals:

  • Submit appeal before automatic denial occurs
  • Include all requested documentation with appeal
  • Reference original deferral and CO-143 code
  • Provide timeline of attempted resolutions

Post-Conversion Appeals:

  • Follow standard appeal process for converted denial code
  • Include documentation of original CO-143 deferral
  • Demonstrate good faith effort to provide information
  • Request reconsideration based on administrative delay

Appeal Documentation Package

Required Components:

  • Original EOB showing CO-143 deferral
  • All correspondence with payer regarding deferral
  • Documentation submitted in response to deferral
  • Timeline of provider actions and payer responses
  • Appeal letter requesting payment of deferred amount

Tools & Software Recommendations

Deferral Tracking and Management Systems

Software PlatformKey FeaturesMonthly CostBest Use Case
AdvancedMD Revenue CycleAutomated deferral tracking$299-$599Multi-provider practices
Practice Management PlusCO-143 specific workflows$199-$399Specialty practices
Kareo BillingIntegrated follow-up reminders$80-$440Small to medium practices
Epic Revenue GuardianEnterprise deferral managementEnterprise pricingHospital systems

Communication and Documentation Tools

Tool TypeRecommended SolutionFeaturesCost Range
Payer Portal AggregatorAvaility EssentialsMulti-payer access$89-$299/month
Document ManagementOffice 365 SharePointSecure file sharing$5-$22/user/month
Communication TrackingSalesforce Health CloudInteraction logging$150-$300/user/month
Workflow AutomationMicrosoft Power AutomateAutomated follow-ups$15-$40/user/month

Reporting and Analytics Platforms

PlatformAnalytics FeaturesIntegration OptionsPricing Model
Tableau HealthcareDeferral trend analysisAPI connections$70-$175/user/month
Power BI PremiumCustom deferral dashboardsMicrosoft ecosystem$20/user/month
QlikSenseReal-time deferral monitoringMultiple data sources$30-$60/user/month
Custom SQL ReportsPractice-specific metricsDirect database accessDevelopment costs

Staff Training Implementation

Training Module 1: CO-143 Identification and Triage (Week1)

  • Objective: Recognize CO-143 deferrals and categorize by type
  • Activities: EOB analysis exercises, deferral reason classification
  • Assessment: 95% accuracy in deferral type identification
  • Duration: 4 hours initial training, 1 hour monthly review

Core Competencies Developed:

  • Differentiate CO-143 from true denials
  • Identify common deferral triggers
  • Categorize deferrals by resolution pathway
  • Prioritize deferrals by financial impact

Training Module 2: Information Gathering and Documentation (Week 2)

  • Objective: Efficiently obtain and organize required documentation
  • Activities: Mock information requests, documentation checklists
  • Assessment: Complete documentation package assembly test
  • Duration: 3 hours initial training, quarterly updates

Skills Development Focus:

  • Payer-specific information requirements
  • Documentation quality standards
  • Submission method preferences by payer
  • Follow-up communication protocols

Training Module 3: Payer Communication and Follow-up (Week 3)

  • Objective: Effective communication with payer representatives
  • Activities: Role-play scenarios, call tracking practice
  • Assessment: Successful resolution of practice deferrals
  • Duration: 5 hours initial training, bi-annual refresher

Communication Skills Training:

  • Professional phone etiquette with payer representatives
  • Effective email communication for complex issues
  • Escalation procedures for unresponsive payers
  • Documentation of all payer interactions

Training Module 4: Technology and Workflow Optimization (Week 4)

  • Objective: Maximize efficiency using available tools
  • Activities: Software training, workflow development
  • Assessment: Demonstrate proficiency in tracking systems
  • Duration: 3 hours initial training, technology updates as needed

Financial Impact & Key Performance Indicators

Revenue Impact Analysis

Average CO-143 Deferral Financial Impact:

  • Typical Deferral Amount: $250-$1,800 per occurrence
  • Resolution Timeline: 30-90 days average
  • Conversion to Payment Rate: 78% with active follow-up
  • Staff Time Investment: 2.5 hours per deferral resolution
  • Administrative Costs: $85-$150 per deferral (staff time + materials)

CO-143 Specific KPI Dashboard

MetricIndustry TargetCurrent AverageHigh-Performing PracticesMonitoring Frequency
Deferral Resolution Rate>85%67.3%91.2%Weekly
Average Resolution Time<45 days68.7 days32.4 daysDaily tracking
Deferral-to-Denial Conversion<15%28.9%8.7%Monthly
Follow-up Response Rate>95%73.2%98.1%Daily
Documentation Completeness>98%81.4%99.3%Per submission

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Deferral Management Investment

Investment Components:

  • Specialized staff training: $1,800 per FTE
  • Deferral tracking software: $200-$600 monthly
  • Enhanced documentation systems: $2,500-$5,000 setup
  • Process improvement consulting: $3,000-$8,000

Financial Returns (Annual):

  • Recovered deferred payments: $35,000-$85,000
  • Reduced conversion to denials: $18,000-$45,000
  • Improved cash flow timing: $22,000-$40,000
  • Reduced staff overtime: $12,000-$20,000

ROI Calculation:

  • Initial investment: $8,000-$20,000
  • Annual returns: $87,000-$190,000
  • Net ROI: 435-950% within first year

Cash Flow Impact Modeling

Before Optimization:

  • Average deferral resolution: 68.7 days
  • Conversion to payment: 67.3%
  • Average monthly deferrals: $25,000
  • Cash flow delay cost: $2,100 monthly

After Optimization:

  • Average deferral resolution: 32.4 days
  • Conversion to payment: 91.2%
  • Improved cash flow timing: $18,500 monthly acceleration
  • Net monthly improvement: $16,400

Real-World Case Study: Multi-Payer Coordination Deferral

Patient: Maria Santos, Age 45
Primary Insurance: Aetna PPO
Secondary Insurance: Medicare Part B (ESRD)
Tertiary Coverage: State Medicaid
Deferred Amount: $4,127.85
Services: Dialysis treatments, physician visits, laboratory tests

Initial Scenario: Ms. Santos has End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) creating complex coordination between Aetna (group health), Medicare (ESRD coverage), and Medicaid (state assistance). Claims for three months of dialysis services were submitted to Aetna as primary payer, resulting in CO-143 deferrals totaling $4,127.85 while investigating Medicare coordination requirements.

Complexity Factors:

  • Medicare becomes primary for ESRD after 30-month coordination period
  • Aetna investigating whether 30-month period had elapsed
  • State Medicaid coordination rules for ESRD patients
  • Multiple service dates spanning coordination period transition
  • Different Medicare coverage rules for dialysis vs. physician services

Resolution Timeline and Actions:

Days 1-3: Initial Assessment

  • Reviewed EOB showing CO-143 deferrals for dialysis services
  • Identified Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) investigation as cause
  • Contacted Aetna provider services for specific information requirements
  • Documented patient’s ESRD diagnosis date and Medicare eligibility

Days 4-8: Information Gathering

  • Obtained Medicare enrollment documentation showing 30-month coordination period
  • Calculated exact transition date from Aetna primary to Medicare primary
  • Gathered complete dialysis treatment records for affected period
  • Verified Medicaid coverage and coordination rules for ESRD

Days 9-12: Documentation Submission

  • Submitted Medicare enrollment documentation to Aetna
  • Provided detailed timeline of ESRD diagnosis and treatment initiation
  • Included physician documentation of medical necessity
  • Submitted coordination of benefits worksheet for three-payer scenario

Days 13-25: Payer Investigation Period

  • Aetna conducted internal review of Medicare coordination requirements
  • Medicare confirmed primary payer status for services after 30-month period
  • Medicaid verified tertiary payer responsibilities
  • Patient advocacy required for expedited processing

Days 26-35: Partial Resolution

  • Aetna paid $2,890.50 for services during their primary responsibility period
  • Transferred $1,237.35 to Medicare as primary for post-30-month services
  • Remaining balance of $0 identified as patient responsibility

Days 36-42: Final Coordination

  • Medicare processed transferred claims and paid $1,089.22
  • Medicaid paid remaining $148.13 as tertiary payer
  • Patient responsibility finalized at $0 due to Medicaid coverage

Final Outcome:

  • Total Resolution Time: 42 days
  • Amount Recovered: $4,127.85 (100% success rate)
  • Multiple Payer Coordination: Successfully navigated three-payer system
  • Process Improvements: Developed ESRD-specific coordination protocols

Key Learnings:

  1. ESRD cases require specialized coordination knowledge due to Medicare’s unique 30-month rule
  2. Multi-payer deferrals need systematic tracking of each payer’s responsibilities
  3. Patient advocacy accelerates resolution for complex coordination scenarios
  4. Documentation requirements vary significantly between payers in coordination situations

Process Improvements Implemented:

  • ESRD patient identification system for proactive coordination planning
  • Automated Medicare 30-month period calculation tools
  • Staff training on complex MSP coordination scenarios
  • Patient communication protocols for extended resolution timeframes

Replication Strategy: This case demonstrates the importance of understanding payer-specific coordination rules and maintaining detailed documentation throughout the deferral resolution process. The systematic approach can be applied to other complex coordination scenarios involving multiple payers.

Summary and Next Steps

Immediate Action Items for CO-143 Management:

  1. Implement systematic deferral tracking using practice management system or dedicated software
  2. Establish standard follow-up timelines based on deferral type and payer
  3. Create documentation checklists for common deferral scenarios
  4. Train staff on payer-specific information requirements and submission methods

30-Day Implementation Roadmap:

  • Week 1: Audit current deferrals and categorize by type and age
  • Week 2: Implement tracking system and establish follow-up protocols
  • Week 3: Train staff on deferral identification and resolution processes
  • Week 4: Launch KPI monitoring and quality assurance measures

Long-term Strategic Goals (90 Days):

  1. Achieve 85%+ deferral resolution rate through systematic follow-up
  2. Reduce average resolution time to under 45 days
  3. Minimize deferral-to-denial conversion to below 15%
  4. Improve cash flow through faster deferral resolution

Success Factors for CO-143 Management:

  • Proactive information gathering and submission
  • Consistent follow-up communication with payers
  • Complete documentation for all deferral responses
  • Staff training on coordination of benefits and payer-specific requirements
  • Technology utilization for tracking and workflow management

Financial Performance Targets:

  • Increase deferral resolution rate from 67% to 90%
  • Reduce average resolution time from 69 days to 35 days
  • Achieve 95%+ documentation completeness rate
  • Generate 400%+ ROI on deferral management investments

Quality Assurance Measures:

  • Monthly deferral aging reports and trend analysis
  • Quarterly staff performance reviews on deferral resolution
  • Annual payer relationship assessment and improvement planning
  • Continuous process improvement based on resolution outcomes

By implementing these comprehensive deferral management procedures, practices typically convert 85-95% of CO-143 deferrals to payments while significantly improving cash flow timing and reducing administrative burden on revenue cycle staff.


Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How long can a payer defer payment with CO-143? A: Timeframes vary by payer and reason. Most commercial payers resolve within 30-60 days, Medicare within 45-90 days. After set periods, deferrals typically convert to denials if unresolved.

Q: Should I submit additional documentation immediately for CO-143? A: Contact the payer first to understand specific requirements. Submitting incorrect or unnecessary documentation can delay resolution further.

Q: Can I appeal a CO-143 deferral? A: CO-143 is not technically a denial, so standard appeals don’t apply. However, you can request expedited processing if the deferral exceeds normal timeframes.

Q: What’s the difference between CO-143 and claim pending status? A: CO-143 indicates a specific portion is deferred pending additional information. Regular pending status means the entire claim is in normal processing queue.

Q: How do I prevent CO-143 deferrals? A: Complete pre-service verification, submit comprehensive documentation initially, verify coordination of benefits, and maintain current provider credentialing status.

I’m Theodore, CPC, Lead Billing Specialist at Maple Grove Family Practice, with 10+ years in medical billing, AR and billing software optimization.

I’m Theodore, a seasoned medical billing professional with over 10 years’ experience guiding practices through every step of the revenue cycle. I specialise in claim submission, denial management, and accounts receivable reconciliation, and I’m fluent in top billing platforms like AthenaOne and AdvancedMD. My passion is streamlining workflows to reduce days in AR and boost first-pass claim acceptance rates. Above all, I believe in a patient-focused approach making sure every charge is accurate and transparent so your practice can thrive.

Leave a Comment